Friday, November 14, 2025

Inequality Then and Now: Now It's Too Late

In refusing to recognize that inequality had the potential to bring down the entire system, our delay has made that reckoning inevitable.

The theme here is problems are not resolved, they're papered over with profitable faux fixes. In my previous post, I described how the problem of our collective health crisis isn't being resolved, it's being milked for profit by faux "solutions" that don't actually resolve the problem, they keep it on simmer because this is the most profitable arrangement for those providing the illusory "solution."

I have endeavored to explain why extreme inequality will undo not just democracy, it will undo the entire social order and the economy as well. We currently live in a fantasy world in which finance and market forces operate with impunity, as the focus is on profits and "growth."

That finance and market forces have profound social consequences is ignored. This reality has been explored since the 1800s, by critics ranging from Emerson to Marx ("All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned") to modern critics such as Christopher Lasch, author of The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy (1995) and more recently, by Jeffrey L. Degner in his new book Inflation and the Family: Monetary Policy's Impact on Household Life, which is described in The Social Costs Of Inflation (Quoth the Raven, via Rich W.)

That inequality of wealth, income and opportunity has reached dangerous extremes in America has been starkly visible since the save-the-fraudsters response to the 2008-09 Financial Fraud Meltdown (a.k.a. the Global Financial Crisis). In the aftermath, a number of incisive essays were published by journals left, right and center on the urgent need to address soaring inequality.

These three essays from 2011-2013 cover the many systemic dynamics of this problem: I cannot stress strongly enough that neither the left nor the right have mounted a meaningful response, as this is not an issue that boils down to a strictly partisan / political or economic problem--it encompasses the entirety of the status quo system: culture, society, economy and the political/policy sphere.

This not-left-or-right nature confuses many, who automatically seek to compartmentalize the problem and proposed solutions as left or right. Inequality cannot be constrained to stale political boundaries if we are to understand it as a problem that needs real resolutions, not superficial fake fixes. This is perhaps best exemplified by Christopher Lasch, whose nuanced work cannot be pigeonholed as right or left.

His savaging of the status quo economy's dismantling of the family can be interpreted as conservative, while Lasch's appreciation of Marx's critique can be labeled progressive. Both labels are misleading, as Lasch's work cannot be understood within the narrow confines of conventional knee-jerk us-them thinking.

This applies to all thoughtful discussions of soaring inequality. Mike Lofgren's essay in the August 2012 issue of The American Conservative magazine is a brilliant summary of just how far we've fallen: Revolt of the Rich: Our financial elites are the new secessionists:

"It was 1993, during congressional debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement. I was having lunch with a staffer for one of the rare Republican congressmen who opposed the policy of so-called free trade. To this day, I remember something my colleague said: 'The rich elites of this country have far more in common with their counterparts in London, Paris, and Tokyo than with their fellow American citizens'."

"Lasch held that the elites--by which he meant not just the super-wealthy but also their managerial coat holders and professional apologists--were undermining the country's promise as a constitutional republic with their prehensile greed, their asocial cultural values, and their absence of civic responsibility. Lasch wrote that in 1995. Now, almost two decades later, the super-rich have achieved escape velocity from the gravitational pull of the very society they rule over. They have seceded from America."


Jerry Z. Muller, Professor of History at the Catholic University of America, wrote a dispassionate, thorough essay on the many structural sources of inequality in 2013: Capitalism and Inequality: What the Right and the Left Get Wrong (April 2013)

(In 2012): "The central focus of the left today is on increasing government taxing and spending, primarily to reverse the growing stratification of society, whereas the central focus of the right is on decreasing taxing and spending, primarily to ensure economic dynamism. Each side minimizes the concerns of the other, and each seems to believe that its desired policies are sufficient to ensure prosperity and social stability. Both are wrong.

Inequality is indeed increasing almost everywhere in the postindustrial capitalist world. But despite what many on the left think, this is not the result of politics, nor is politics likely to reverse it, for the problem is more deeply rooted and intractable than generally recognized. Inequality is an inevitable product of capitalist activity, and expanding equality of opportunity only increases it--because some individuals and communities are simply better able than others to exploit the opportunities for development and advancement that capitalism affords.

Despite what many on the right think, however, this is a problem for everybody, not just those who are doing poorly or those who are ideologically committed to egalitarianism--because if left unaddressed, rising inequality and economic insecurity can erode social order and generate a populist backlash against the capitalist system at large."


George Packer unpacked the sources of decay that push inequality to extremes in his comprehensive December 2011 essay The Broken Contract: Inequality and American Decline:

"Inequality hardens society into a class system, imprisoning people in the circumstances of their birth--a rebuke to the very idea of The American Dream."

(in 2012:) "The same ailments were on full display in Washington this past summer, during the debt-ceiling debacle: ideological rigidity bordering on fanaticism, an indifference to facts, an inability to think beyond the short term, the dissolution of national interest into partisan advantage."


Muller and Packer dismantle every conventional "solution" as inadequate or worse: more education, more policy tweaks, financial gimmicks--all are fake fixes that avoid the hard part, which is addressing the underlying decay in both our society and economy that has replaced "solutions" with self-enrichment.

I elaborate the way this replacement of real solutions with self-enrichment has been systematically normalized in my new book Investing In Revolution.

I often reprint this chart from the Federal Reserve because it shows how the wealth (and thus the power) of the wealthiest has achieved escape velocity not just from inflation but from any restraints.



And I often reprint this chart to show how the bottom 50% of Americans have actually lost ground in the "wealth creation" of asset bubbles.



The fantasy-fake solutions of both the left and right distill down to financial-technocrat fixes that leave the engines of inequality untouched, as those proposing the faux fixes don't dare upset the gravy train that's enriching everyone in the top tier of the status quo.

I composed this chart to illustrate how the usual bag of fake fixes--more tech, technocratic, political policy tweaks, so-called market-solutions--all avoid uprooting the system that increases inequality by its very nature because this system benefits the few at the top at the expense of the many--and the few control the machinery and manage the gearing.



If we'd tackled inequality in 2012-13 with resolve, regardless of the pain that would cause those currently enriching themselves with impunity, we might have gotten somewhere by now. But we didn't. And now it's too late.

Doing nothing is an illusory "solution." Systemic problems like inequality are not unchanging items that await our attention; they are dynamic and self-reinforcing, and in refusing to recognize that inequality had the potential to bring down the entire system, our delay has made that reckoning inevitable.


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Dennis P. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, David E. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, D.G. ($7/month), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Francis ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Did the "Solution" Solve the Problem, Or Did It Just Make Somebody Rich?

Here's the real problem: there's no profit in a raw carrot and a walk around the block.

Here's our mythology in a nutshell: human needs are limited but human desires are unlimited, and the economy is fueled by smart people motivated by profit to fulfill our desires. Since desires and human ingenuity are both unlimited, the economy is unlimited.

This story is heartwarming but it's a fairy tale because it leaves out marketing and monopoly: marketing shapes desire to fit what's being sold, not the other way around, and monopoly eliminates choices that don't generate enormous profits for those who own the monopoly.

It isn't surprising that our economy is dominated by marketing and monopoly, because these are what generate the really big profits. The fairy tale features the canny innovator producing a better mousetrap but the real profits are made by eliminating competing mousetraps and forcing consumers to buy products and services that are highly profitable without being highly beneficial.

Which brings us to this question: does the "solution" actually solve the problem, or does it just make somebody a lot of money? Since the most important component of "wealth, abundance and prosperity" is our health, let's focus on health.

It's self-evident that being overweight/obese is a systemic risk to our overall health. It's also self-evident that this risk factor was relatively rare in the early 1960s and is now prevalent, with recent studies finding only 22% of the US adult populace normal or underweight and about 70% are obese.

Traditional calculations find about 75% of the adult populace is overweight/obese and 25% are normal weight.



Over half the adult populace is either prediabetic or diabetic.



The solution being offered is expensive, highly profitable weight-loss drugs which have many side-effects. But is this really the best solution, or is it a "solution" to the "problem" of how to generate higher profits?

Isn't the obvious line of inquiry here to ask why we were healthier 60 years ago and seek to replicate those conditions? In other words, isn't the obvious solution to go back to what worked without costly, risky interventions?

By all accounts, we were more active and ate mostly real food 60 years ago. We were more active in everyday life; nobody was getting up at 5 am to go to the gym except a handful of professional body-builders or athletes.

Today, our collective diet is dominated by highly processed foods, sugary beverages, unhealthy snacks and fast food, all of which meet two criteria: 1. they are inherently unhealthy and 2) they are highly profitable.

In summary: "solutions" are no longer about actually solving problems: "solutions" are about defining the "problem" so that a highly profitable fake solution can be marketed by a cartel or monopoly.

Here's the real problem: there's no profit in a raw carrot and a walk around the block. "Solutions" must be profitable or they're not "solutions." That these fake "solutions" generate new unsolvable problems--well, you can't stop "Progress."


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Dennis P. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, David E. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, D.G. ($7/month), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Francis ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Thursday, November 06, 2025

The Risk of AI Isn't Skynet

Just as a reminder of what's being gambled on "AI supremacy": it's not just financial capital, it's everything.

The risk that AI transitions from Servant to Master is dramatically appealing--Skynet!--but the real risks are in the mundane realms of the socio-economic order. As I explain in my new book Investing In Revolution, technological revolutions share the same dynamic: those profiting from the innovations push them pell-mell, without regard for future consequences, as the goal is to expand as quickly as possible to achieve market dominance.

This is entirely understandable, as pausing to assess potential pitfalls will effectively cede control to competitors.

Society--all of civilization that isn't reducible to financial data--bears the consequences, but over a timespan far longer than the initial expansion of the technology. In other words, the immediate rewards of the technological revolution go to the fast-moving innovators while the broader consequences--both the benefits and the downsides--impact the socio-cultural-political realms over a much longer time frame.

This creates a time-response lag, where society must absorb and assess the consequences years or even decades after the initial expansion of the technology. The organizational tool of innovators is the corporation, a financial structure with a single goal--expand revenues and profits by any means available--and a quasi-military command-control-communications (a.k.a. 3C) hierarchy.

This structure meshes perfectly with markets, which price everything in the moment: markets lack mechanisms to price future consequences; they only price production, transport, currencies, materials, marketing, inventory, etc. in the present.

In contrast, society is characterized by a multitude of interests and structures in various stages of advocacy. There is no one single goal or hierarchy, and the upsides and downsides of technological changes are typically distributed very unevenly.

Those positioned to reap the rewards gain ground, those positioned to bear the brunt of negative consequences lose ground. Each will then advocate for controls or let-it-run-wild accordingly.

The American ethos favors the let-it-run-wild and pick up the pieces later approach to technological revolutions. This serves the interests of the initial innovators and speculators, who can amass great fortunes in the initial speculative frenzy to get on board. This has played out in railroads, autos, radio, TV, the Internet, and so on.

Each revolution is characterized as creative destruction the buggy whip industry is wiped out, but a larger industry is created.

Here is where correlation is confused with causation: the fact that this cycle has played out in the recent past does not make it a Law of Nature, i.e. a predictable manifestation of causation.

Which brings us to AI. AI is different: it doesn't generate a need for more human labor as it expands, it replaces human labor. This is its implicit raison d'etre, reason to exist.

The rewards go to the initial innovators' corporations and speculators, and the consequences fall on a society ill-prepared to assess them, much less limit them.

AI is different in another way: it generates a compelling facsimile of human characteristics and interactions, facsimiles of thought and knowledge that we take as "real" because they're in "our language."

But as I explain in my book Ultra-Processed Life, these facsimiles are all processed in ways we cannot discern: everything is processed in black boxes following scripts and agendas that we can't see.

What's presented as an accurate representation is actually an ultra-processed distillation that leaves out everything that's unwieldy or unwelcome. We're told that what's the screen is real, but it's not; it's the equivalent of an orange-colored ultra-processed, sugary, salty, greasy goo being presented as a "healthy snack alternative" to a raw carrot.

What's being lost in substituting AI's ultra-processed facsimiles occurs beneath our perception. We don't notice what's been lost, and so we can no longer make a realistic assessment: that capacity has been lost.

AI is also accelerating the process of technological change, a process that's been accelerating for 60 years. Alvin Toffler's 1970 book Future Shock described the disorienting nature of technology-driven change, a theme updated by Douglas Rushkoff in his 2004 book, Present Shock.

Put these dynamics together and we reach this analogy: we're children playing with matches and gasoline in a drought-stricken forest of dry deadwood. Even as the formidable resources of big-tech corporations and the state rush to secure AI supremacy, we may have it backwards: those squandering resources to build out a state-corporate Skynet "to serve humanity" are speeding our self-destruction, while those societies that limit their exposure to AI's ultra-processed goo will emerge as the winners rather than the losers.

Just as a reminder of what's being gambled on AI supremacy: it's not just financial capital, it's everything.




My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)

New podcast: Anti-Progress, Reverse Leverage and the Hot-Potato Economy (45 min)



Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Marty D. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Friend of Pacepa ($70), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, Keith S. ($100), for your outrageously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Lee S. ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Monday, November 03, 2025

The Inevitable Drift Down from "Can't Lose" Owning Stocks to "Can't Win"

Even if an AI program advises selling everything and walking away from the market for five years, how many of us would take this advice?

Only those who experienced the heady euphoria of the late 1990s dot-com bubble in tech stocks know what the shift from "can't lose" confidence to "can't win" surrender feels like. The chart below illustrates this emotional cycle of confidence rising and fading as bubbles inflate and deflate.

Though we like to tell ourselves we're rational investors, animal spirits are the driving force in euphoric bubbles where our beliefs direct our decisions: we come to believe that we're smarter than the cautious dummies, that the technological revolution underway has plenty more room to run, that policies supportive of stocks have been refined and institutionalized to the point they're rock-solid foundations, and so on.

Though the chart doesn't go back to the 1870s bust or the 1930s Great Depression, the cycle played out in those eras, too. The process of confidence fading is painfully long, as the rewards of "buying the dip" have been so generous and reliable that we naturally assume any decline will be brief.

When the recovery we anticipated rolls over and reaches new lows, we're sure the authorities will "do whatever it takes" to reinflate the markets, but authorities don't actually have god-like powers; their powers only appeared god-like because conditions favored their interventions.

Every new low hurts, but we're still confident that the market fundamentals are intact, authorities have plenty of policy bazookas they can launch, and the recommendations of Wall Street analysts to "buy the dip" are encouraging.

(Those trading in the 2000-2002 era recall Wall Street analysts touting dot-com stocks that had fallen from $80 to $40 as "strong buys," meanwhile the stock finally bottom at $4. Following the "buy" recommendation yielded a 90% loss.)

We attribute any run of bad luck to over-confidence rather than misjudgment of the entire market and economy: OK, we blew the last few trades, but we can get our mojo back.

In the years this process takes to exhaust itself, inflation is eating away at nominal stock prices. As the third chart illustrates, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) finally returned to its 1966 peak above 1,000 in 1973, that didn't mean investors were made whole; inflation had consumed 37% of the value of their stock holdings. To be made whole, DJIA would have to reach 1,370, not 1,000.

The real losses were even bleaker the next time the DJIA again closed above 1,000 on October 12,1982. Investors who held their index portfolios from the peak in 1966 to 1982 lost two-thirds of the purchasing power of their investment. They would not be made whole until the DJIA rose well above 3,000.

The trend that pops out of this long-term chart is that each new peak of household assets invested in stocks is higher than the previous peak. What will the nominal valuation of stock indices be when the percentage of household assets invested in stocks falls from 45% to 15%? What will the purchasing power of the money invested be (i.e. adjusted for real-world inflation) at that point?



This is unknowable, but if history is any guide--and we have no other--then a 50% to 80% decline would be "normal." Consider this chart of the dot-com bubble and deflation: an 80% decline, exhibiting remarkable symmetry:



Inflation renders nominal stock index valuations meaningless:



The drift from "can't lose" to "can't win" is slow and painful. Our beliefs are stubborn, and we cling on to what worked in the past long after it stopped working. Even if an AI program advises selling everything and walking away from the market for five years, how many of us would take this advice? History says: very few.


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)

New podcast: Anti-Progress, Reverse Leverage and the Hot-Potato Economy (45 min)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Charles J. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Pete W. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, Jeff P. ($70), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Donna B. ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Thursday, October 30, 2025

Yes, Everything Crashed--Just Not For You

When people stop participating in their own servitude, then things change.

A dedicated cadre of readers is devoted to reminding me that I've been wrong since 2009, as stocks, housing and GDP have all soared. We skeptics and doom-and-gloomers have all been wrong, and when stocks briefly dip, we're identified as broken clocks--right on occasion but not for being "right."

These readers are of course doing well. None are in the bottom 50% of Americans who have already experienced the crash. But since the top 10% dominate the media, both legacy and social media, and they've done splendidly in the Everything Bubble that's been inflating for the past 16 years, then they don't see the crash the 50% have experienced, for the top 10% live in a completely different world from the bottom 50%, whose experience tracks a third-world country far removed from jetting around the world and complaining about high taxes.

Life has crashed for the bottom 50% since 2009, but since those reporting the "news," issuing glowing commentary about AI, nuclear power, missions to the Moon, etc., and making big bucks as influencers didn't experience the crash, it has gone largely unnoticed except for occasional reporting in the legacy and social media: people making substantially more than minimum wage living in vans and cars because they can't afford the local rents, and similar stories.

In a Snow Paradise, They Live in This Parking Lot People experiencing homelessness can sleep in their cars in this wealthy ski town in Colorado, but only if they have a job.

The Invisible Man We see right through the unshowered soul living in a car by the beach, or by the Walmart, or by the side of the road. But he's there, and he used to be somebody. He still is. A firsthand account of homelessness in America.

An American physician with nearly 50 years of experience brought me up short when he reported that for many Americans, the healthcare they receive is equivalent to what third-world residents receive. Third World--which evokes grinding poverty, inescapable immiseration, failing infrastructure, a neofeudal divide between the few wealthy and the many poor, a society with no limits on exploitation and profiteering ruled by elites that are not merely corrupt but also incompetent--has been replaced by the sanitized developing world, but the point here isn't the trend to sanitize repellent realities with textual tropes, it's the refusal of America's top 10% to acknowledge that for many of the bottom 50%, America under their leadership is a third world nation.

The top 10% cling to the soaring stock market and rising GDP as markers of the nation's robust economy and success to avoid dealing with lived reality, as if their fairy-tale belief that soaring stocks means life is good is actually real; if you're falling behind, well, work harder, work smarter, be more frugal--be more like us, in other words.

While the top 10% busy themselves with using AI to improve work flow, obsessing over geopolitics and the decay of the perks of their Titanium credit card, other Americans are concerned with finding a second or third side-hustle as the soaring costs of utilities, rent, auto insurance and repairs, childcare and healthcare are forcing choices nobody wants to make: what not to pay.

As the cracks widen, it gets harder not to avoid falling into one. So much of everyday life in America is now a parody of precarity that is right out of a black-comedy script of a nation blindly telling itself that all is well because AI is amazing and we're going back to the Moon while families are abandoning their beloved pets because they cannot afford four-figure vet bills.

The top 10%, secure in their bubble, don't even notice that private equity is snapping up vet clinics precisely because people will pay whatever it takes to care for their pet. This is exploitation and profiteering on a scale that makes a mockery of the fantasy that ours is an economy of opportunity.

The withdrawal of the top 10% from the bottom 90% is not a new trend; it's merely gathered momentum. Author Christopher Lasch described this class bifurcation decades ago in his 1995 book The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy.

It's important to the top 10% to maintain the illusion that they didn't benefit from conditions that are no longer available to all. They are loathe to admit that the US economy is now one in which the bottom 90% work to serve the top 10%, who account for half of all consumer spending and the lion's share of discretionary spending--all the goodies such as vacations overseas, mileage upgrades to business class, etc.

As I outline in my recent books, Progress is illusory, a myth that cloaks the reality that life is getting more difficult, not easier: this is Anti-Progress, the opposite of Progress.

This reality is fragmented by distractions and addictions and the busy-ness of trying to do all the unpaid shadow work now required to keep everything glued together. All that was once authentic has been slowly replaced by Ultra-Processed Life, artifices that are easier to manage than messy reality.

What happens when people can no longer pay for everything they need to live? If history is any guide, somebody figures out that rather than scattered individuals defaulting here and there, an organized default is the only real power left. If 100,000 tenants in a city all go on a rent strike, withholding rent until there is some recognition of the unviability of the status quo, what's the response? To evict 100,000 households?

There are many historical examples of general strikes, where those serving the top 10% don't show up for work. All the real work--not the phony AI work flows--is no longer performed.

When people stop participating in their own servitude, then things change. People can opt out on their own, or they might cooperate in a group opt-out. The point here is the crash that the top 10% didn't experience and therefore ignore has already happened.



Here's how the bottom 50% experienced the S&P 500 soaring from 666 in 2009 to 6900 this week. Their share of the nation's expanding financial wealth is so small it's signal noise.



The bottom 90% have lost ground. And it's not because they're not working hard enough.



Just because we didn't experience it doesn't mean there was no crash. Is this uncomfortable? Undoubtedly. But more importantly--what's our response?

I explore these trends and realities in my trilogy:




My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through October 31. Introduction (free)

New podcast: Anti-Progress, Reverse Leverage and the Hot-Potato Economy (45 min)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Charles J. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Pete W. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, Jeff P. ($70), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Donna B. ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Terms of Service

All content on this blog is provided by Trewe LLC for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at anytime and without notice.


Our Privacy Policy:


Correspondents' email is strictly confidential. This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by a third-party advertising network (Investing Channel) may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising; if you wish to opt out of Interest-Based Advertising, please go to Opt out of interest-based advertising (The Network Advertising Initiative). If you have other privacy concerns relating to advertisements, please contact advertisers directly. Websites and blog links on the site's blog roll are posted at my discretion.


PRIVACY NOTICE FOR EEA INDIVIDUALS


This section covers disclosures on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for users residing within EEA only. GDPR replaces the existing Directive 95/46/ec, and aims at harmonizing data protection laws in the EU that are fit for purpose in the digital age. The primary objective of the GDPR is to give citizens back control of their personal data. Please follow the link below to access InvestingChannel’s General Data Protection Notice. https://stg.media.investingchannel.com/gdpr-notice/


Notice of Compliance with The California Consumer Protection Act
This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by a third-party advertising network (Investing Channel) may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising. If you do not want any personal information that may be collected by third-party advertising to be sold, please follow the instructions on this page: Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information.


Regarding Cookies:


This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by third-party advertising networks such as Investing Channel may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising; if you wish to opt out of Interest-Based Advertising, please go to Opt out of interest-based advertising (The Network Advertising Initiative) If you have other privacy concerns relating to advertisements, please contact advertisers directly.


Our Commission Policy:

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I also earn a commission on purchases of precious metals via BullionVault. I receive no fees or compensation for any other non-advertising links or content posted on my site.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP