Monday, December 03, 2007

The Economist Cover Dollar Indicator

Back in December 2004, the dollar swooned to 80 on the Dollar Index (DXY), and The Economist magazine ran a cover suggesting the dollar's demise.
As the chart below shows, the dollar shrugged off its lethargy shortly after and climbed 15% over the next year.

Was this a long-term reversal? No, as the dollar resumed its decline a year later. But in the meantime, all those betting against the dollar suffered losses for over a year.

Here is the current cover of The Economist. Need I say more? Below is a chart of the dollar with the date of the previous Economist Cover Indicator.

My first market mentor used to say that it's never what the market already knows that causes big moves, it's what the market doesn't know. As this cover indicates, the market knows all about the dollar's weakness and its structural woes.

Therefore it behooves us to ask: what might cause the dollar to again shrug off the universally negative sentiment and actually rise by 15% or more?

Two frequent contributors sent in very interesting comments which help elucidate just how the dollar might strengthen despite the nearly universal opinion that it is doomed.

Here are Protagoras's cogent comments:

If there is a greater bubble than the US one, with more corrupt lending and worse accounting, its the Chinese one. When this one bursts, a flood of money might well flow back into relative safety of dollars. Accounts of the dollar's short term death might be premature. It might spike amazingly before it goes bad.

You will have heard the story about the salesman the systems engineer and the bear? They are camping and see a bear ambling towards them. The salesman starts to put on his running shoes. The engineer says, you don't think you can outrun a bear? The salesman says, I don't have to, I only have to outrun you.

The US doesn't have to be safe, just safer, and doesn't even have to be safer for very long. (emphasis added--CHS) It just has to be safer than the Asian currencies for a short time, and it will bankrupt a lot of dollar bears.

Albert T. contributed a link about China's Sovereign Fund and added his astute observations:

Great wall of money: $250 billion to flow from China
"HSBC says it reached the $246 billion figure using a formula that assumes China's foreign-exchange reserve expanding at between $30 billion and $40 billion a month, while appreciation of the yuan would be held to 7% against the U.S. dollar. The formula assumes that little of the money will head into global bond markets as the yuan appreciates rapidly and U.S. Treasury yields decline."

"HSBC said that next year Chinese authorities will likely approve $10 billion in overseas investments to mutual funds each month, while $67 billion will be invested through China's sovereign wealth fund, or China Investment Corp., and $27 billion will come from the "through train" investment scheme, which is likely to come into effect during the second half. Fund outflows that have been approved but not yet utilized will make up some of the remainder."

My thoughts on this are very simple: no matter where they start investing their money, prices will be effected elsewhere since any reasonable investors who have assessed their markets as overvalued will invest elsewhere. The other intuition is political: perogatives could take over from financial goals ergo outpace appreciation of yuan (my assumption). Hence they could invest in companies that are industrially important for future development in China.

Gov'ts aren't great investors I would think but who knows maybe if they pay their fund managers $3000 dollars a month they will perform just as well as Peter Lynch, or Carl Icahn (sarcasm intended). The wisest solution to this would have been to actually allow people in China to receive gains from Yuan appreciation while it seems like it would have slowed export growth it probably would have increased domestic demand of all goods and shored up stability of demand.

But maybe I am wrong and focusing on exports is the way to go especially when in order to get them you have to keep loaning people money to buy those exports. (emphasis added--CHS) Leveraging to our currency seemed great when we had low inflation and exchange stability but when our inflation magnifies they will have a severe feedback from this currency loop of their own inflation. (probably going on now in the early stages)

$250 billion I am sure could be used to pay foreign firms to build out infrastructure in China, water de-salination, water purification, sewage treatment and other wonderful things could be done. I guess we are going to have a China Stock bubble now. I could see it now them pouring money in for a year or two and after the flows stop massive price collapse and the heads of managers will roll along with investments being reversed and further price collapse until that $250 billion is fully transferred elsewhere. (pardon my cynicism)

Could non-U.S. capital provide a possible prop for the dollar? If all these Sovereign Funds/ government-mandated pools of capital start buying assets--total assets in these funds are supposedly in the $1.2 trillion range and estimated to reach $5+ trillion in a few years--some will surely be made in in the U.S. (25% of global GDP), especially if the weak dollar has put some U.S. assets "on sale." These investments would be made in dollars, meaning the funds have to buy dollars to make the investments. That would serve to strengthen the dollar, regardless of how other currencies were performing vis a vis the dollar.

And as Protagoras observes, the dollar (and by proxy, the U.S.) doesn't have to be safe--it needs only to be perceived as safer for a relatively short period of time.

Here is a short-term chart of the dollar, and an interesting link from frequent contributor U. Doran on the dollar and oil:

The Epic Battle Over Crude Oil and the US$ (by Gary Dorsch,

Thank you, Protagoras, Albert T. and U. Doran for contributing to our understanding of the dollar's moves--and a hat-tip to The Economist for the infallible Cover Indicator.

Thanks to you, readers, this small outpost on the Great Worldwide Web received over 100,000 visits (by 51,826 unique visitors) last month--the first time it has been so honored by more than 100,000 readers.

Thank you, Tom S., ($50), for your outrageously generous third contribution to this humble site. I am greatly honored by your readership and support. All contributors are listed below in acknowledgement of my gratitude.

To view all archives, please go to

Terms of Service

All content on this blog is provided by Trewe LLC for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at anytime and without notice.

Our Privacy Policy:

Correspondents' email is strictly confidential. This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by third-party advertising networks such as Adsense and Investing Channel may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising; if you wish to opt out of Interest-Based Advertising, please go to Opt out of interest-based advertising (The Network Advertising Initiative)
If you have other privacy concerns relating to advertisements, please contact advertisers directly. Websites and blog links on the site's blog roll are posted at my discretion.

Our Commission Policy:

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I also earn a commission on purchases of precious metals via BullionVault. I receive no fees or compensation for any other non-advertising links or content posted
on my site.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by 2008

Back to TOP