America's Fatal Synergies
America's financial system and state are themselves the problems,
yet neither system is capable of recognizing this or unwinding their fatal synergies.
why do some systems/states emerge from crises stronger while similar
systems/states collapse?
Put another way: take two very similar political-social-economic systems/nation-states
and two very similar crises, and why does one system not just survive but emerge better
adapted while the other system/state fails?
The answer lies in what author Geoffrey Parker termed Fatal Synergies and Benign Synergies
in his book Global Crisis: War, Climate Change, & Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century.
Synergy results from "interactions that produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects." In other words, 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 8 is linear, while synergy is 2 X 2 X 2 X 2 = 16.
Given that the core function of states is the distribution of resources, capital and agency,
we can distill the difference between Fatal Synergies and Benign Synergies into two questions:
1. What problems cannot be resolved by the financial system/state, no matter how many reforms are
thrown at them?
2. Which groups have a meaningful voice in decision-making / governance and which groups are
effectively voiceless / powerless?
The first question identifies the structural weak points in the system. These weak points could
have any number of sources: they could be perverse incentives embedded in the system, elites
caught up in their own enrichment, or even a willful blindness to the nature of the crisis
threatening the system.
Here's an example in the U.S. system: corporations reap $2.4 trillion in profits annually, roughly
15% of the nation's entire output. Politicians need millions of dollars in campaign contributions
to win elections. Those seeking political influence have not just billions but tens of billions.
Those needing to distribute political favors will do so for mere millions.
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups,
and Average Citizens:
"I'd say that contrary to what decades of political science research might lead you to believe,
ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does in the United States.
And economic elites and interest groups, especially those representing business,
have a substantial degree of influence. Government policy-making over the last few decades reflects
the preferences of those groups -- of economic elites and of organized interests."
This asymmetry
cannot be overcome. Indeed, the past 40 years have witnessed an increasing concentration of
wealth and power in corporations and their lobbyists and a decline of political influence of
the masses to near-zero. Every reform has failed to slow this momentum, which is constructed
of incentives to maximize profits, gain political favors and win elections.
In a similar fashion, the Imperial Presidency has gained power at the expense of Congress for
decades--a reality that scholars bemoan but the reforms allowed by the system are unable to stop.
So we have endless wars of choice without a declaration of war by Congress, one of the core powers
of the elected body.
An analogy to these systemic weak points is the synergies of an organism's essential
organs: if any one organ fails, the organism dies even though the other organs are working
just fine. In other words, any system is only as robust as its weakest essential
component/process.
Whatever problems the system is incapable of resolving have the potential to bring down the system
once they interact synergistically.
The second question identifies how many groups have been suppressed, silenced or ignored by
those at the top of the heap. If these groups have an essential role in the system as producers,
consumers and taxpayers, their demand to have a say in decisions that directly affect them is natural.
Another group with understandable frustrations at being left out of the decision-making are those
in the educated upper classes whose expectations of roles in the top tier were encouraged by their
families, society and training. When these expectations are not met because there are no longer
enough slots in the top tier for the rapidly proliferating upper classes, the group left out in
the cold has the time, education and motivation to demand a voice.
In other words, those denied access to resources, capital and agency who felt entitled to this
access will not be as easily silenced as those who accept their low status and restricted access
to resources, capital and agency as "the natural order of things."
All the groups that are denied a voice and access to resources, capital and agency are in effect
a sealed pressure cooker atop a flame. The pressure builds and builds without any apparent consequence
until it explodes.
The more that power is concentrated in the hands of the few, the greater the desperation of the
groups who are locked out of power. As their desperation rises, some of these groups are willing
to go to whatever lengths are necessary to effect change.
The process of explosive demands for change erupting is difficult to manage once released.
The system's essential subsystems may be destabilized--the equivalent of organ failure--and
once destabilized, it's often no longer possible to restore the previous stability.
In this environment, the common good falls by the wayside and the system collapses.
In the context I've laid out, Fatal Synergies arise when access to resources, capital and agency
are limited by elite hoarding or massive declines in available resources and capital.
Beneficial Synergies arise when whatever resources and capital are available are shared, if not
equitably, at least in a process in which every group affected by the distribution has a voice
in public decision-making.
Fatal Synergies arise when the identity of each group is based not on shared values and cooperation
but on unyielding resistance to competing claims on the nation's wealth and income.
Beneficial Synergies arise when all groups have a voice and a say in the process of distribution,
even if it is limited.
Crises reveal the problems the system is incapable of resolving. How we
respond to those constraints and weak points is the difference between Fatal Synergies and collapse
and Beneficial Synergies that generate successful evolutionary
responses to pressing selective pressures: simply put, "adapt or die."
America's financial system and state are themselves the problems,
yet neither system is capable of recognizing this or unwinding their fatal synergies.
This essay was first published as a weekly Musings Report sent exclusively to subscribers and
patrons at the $5/month ($54/year) and higher level. Thank you, patrons and subscribers, for
supporting my work and free website.
If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by
becoming
a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.
My new book is available!
A Hacker's Teleology: Sharing the Wealth of Our Shrinking Planet
20% and 15% discounts (Kindle $7, print $17,
audiobook now available $17.46)
Read excerpts of the book for free (PDF).
The Story Behind the Book and the Introduction.
Recent Podcasts:
AxisOfEasy Salon 41: Can't get you out of my head (58 min)
Disconnects between the Economy and the Financial Markets (FRA Roundtable, 41 min)
My COVID-19 Pandemic Posts
My recent books:
A Hacker's Teleology: Sharing the Wealth of Our Shrinking Planet
(Kindle $8.95, print $20,
audiobook $17.46)
Read the first section for free (PDF).
Will You Be Richer or Poorer?: Profit, Power, and AI in a Traumatized World
(Kindle $5, print $10, audiobook)
Read the first section for free (PDF).
Pathfinding our Destiny: Preventing the Final Fall of Our Democratic Republic
($5 (Kindle), $10 (print), (
audiobook):
Read the first section for free (PDF).
The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher: The Disappearance of Drake
$1.29 (Kindle), $8.95 (print);
read the first chapters
for free (PDF)
Money and Work Unchained $6.95 (Kindle), $15 (print)
Read the first section for free (PDF).
Become
a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.