Thursday, November 20, 2025

Is AI a Catalyst for Growth--or For Collapse?

Yes, AI is a catalyst. But for what is not yet knowable.

The current narrative holds that the big problem we need to solve is conjuring up cheap energy to power AI data centers. Fortunately for us, the solutions are at hand: building modular nuclear power plants at scale and tapping North America's vast reserves of cheap natural gas.

Problem solved! With cheap energy to power all the AI data centers, we're on a trajectory of fantastic growth of all the good things in life.

Let's consider the implicit assumptions buried in this narrative.

1. The unspoken assumption here is AI will solve all our problems because it's "smart." But this assumes the problems are intellectual puzzles rather than self-reinforcing, self-destructive structures fueled by corruption and perverse incentives embedded in the system itself.

2. The assumption is that if we replace human workers with apps and robots, that will automatically generate Utopia. But this is based on a series of baseless, pie-in-the-sky assumptions about human nature and the nature of social and economic structures.

3. The assumption is that being "entertained" by staring at screens all day is the foundation of human fulfillment and happiness, and so getting rid of human work will usher in Nirvana. The reality is humans are hard-wired to find fulfillment in purposeful, meaningful work that is valued by others. Staring at "entertainment" on screens all day isn't fulfillment, it's deranging and depressing.

This is human nature in a nutshell: Idle hands are the devil's workshop.

4. Another assumption is that every technological revolution generates more and better jobs by some causal mechanism. But there is no law of nature that technology inevitably creates more jobs than it destroys, or that the resulting jobs are more rewarding. That recent history supports this idea doesn't make it a causal law of nature. By its very nature, AI destroys jobs while generating few replacement jobs.

The handful of top AI programmers are paid (or promised) millions of dollars; the industry doesn't need more than a handful of top designers because AI can generate its own conventional coding.

5. This narrative assumes AI will be immensely profitable and the profit motive will push its limitless expansion. But once again, there are no laws of nature that every new technology is inevitably immensely profitable just because it's a new technology.

If the projected use-value doesn't materialize, the investment in the new tech is mal-invested--a stupendous waste of capital chasing a delusional pipe dream. Some percentage might generate some use-value, but this use-value may be obsoleted long before the massive initial investment pays off.

6. Even if the new technology continues expanding, the speculative bubble can deflate 80%. This is the lesson of the dot-com era: that the Internet continued to expand didn't mean the speculative bubble continued inflating: the speculative bubble is not the same thing as the actual use-value in the real world.

The Internet continued expanding even as the dot-com stock bubble collapsed. In other words, this is the best-case scenario: if the use-value of AI is questionable, then the losses can approach 100%.



Here's how this feels in real-time:



7. Perhaps the greatest assumption being made is that there is some law-of-nature inevitability in AI's eventual supremacy. From the perspective laid out in What We've Lost, AI's influence on systemic problems is zero because AI can't reverse moral decay, and it actually reinforces destructive concentrations of capital and power in oligarchic cartels.

In other words, AI is a force not just of disruption (i.e. creative destruction) but of disorder, for its promoters are not accountable for its consequences, which are already visibly corrosive and potentially disastrous.

8. Every trend and every technology reaches an extreme version of its initial state. This extreme can be transformative--but not necessarily in the way proponents anticipate. AI could also be a catalyst for collapse, as the mal-investment on a vast scale bleeds the system of capital while generating consequences which destabilize a system already on the verge of disorder due to extremes of wealth-income inequality and unaffordability.



Put another way: AI is the ultimate projection of disruptive technology, but there are no guarantees that its consequences won't catalyze systemic collapse.

9. AI boosters assume the public will either embrace or be forced to accept their AI dominance. That there could be pushback against AI supremacy that itself catalyzes disorder leading to collapse doesn't enter their blinkered worldview.



Here is how the public may well view AI oligarchs:



10. Technocrats love to declare victory because their models indicate victory is inevitable. But models aren't reality, as things get left out of models without the model builders being aware of what was left out. Consequences generate second-order effects that aren't included in the projections.

Things always look great when simplified into a chart based on projections and data selected to support the shared delusion.



Yes, AI is a catalyst. But for what is not yet knowable. Never mind, here are AI's boosters presenting their version of the "Five O'Clock Follies."


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Jim B. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Robert M. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, Jon W. ($70) for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Troublesome Priest ($70), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

What We've Lost

What we've lost are the foundations of a healthy standard of living / quality of life.

Amidst the constant drumbeat of tech "progress" and grandiose "solutions," it's a useful exercise to ask: what have we lost in the past 40 years despite all the "progress" and "solutions"? Put another way: what did we have in 1985 that we no longer have, despite all the "progress"?

1. We no longer have affordable, functional healthcare. As I have documented, based on what I paid as an employer and self-employed worker, healthcare insurance was still affordable in 1985; this is no longer the case. By functional, I mean universally accessible and sustainable for those employed in healthcare.

Neither condition applies today. Financially marginalized Americans don't have the same access to the care that is available to wealthy Americans and those with gold-plated insurance. For many Americans, their access to care is little better (or worse) than low-income, developed-nation standards.

As for those working in healthcare, burnout and changing jobs to increase pay and reduce overwork are now standard features of frontline employment in healthcare.

2. Our collective health is systemically worse. These charts from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) tell the story: in 1985, relatively few Americans were classified as obese (BMI of 30 or higher). While BMI is not an ideal measure, moderate BMI levels reflect a lifestyle of moderate activity and relatively healthy diet. By 2023, the situation had deteriorated to the point that by more recent metrics, almost 80% of adult Americans are overweight/obese, conditions that generate a spectrum of health risks.

3. Our public infrastructure has crumbled even as our private wealth soared. Maybe the roadways and highways are pothole-free and well-maintained in your area, and public transit is clean, reliable and cheap, but as a general rule, public infrastructure has decayed over the the past 40 years to the point that it's often better in developing-world nations than in the US.

While our public infrastructure has decayed, private wealth has soared from $60 trillion in 2010 to $167 trillion in 2025. Measured by overall health and security, the top 10% are doing splendidly, having accumulated the majority of the $100 trillion in private wealth gains, while the bottom 60% are experiencing decay and decline.

4. Housing is no longer affordable. By any legitimate measure--for example, the number of hours of work needed to buy a median-priced house--housing is no longer affordable for the bottom 80% of the populace.

5. Moral decay has rotted the foundations of our society and economy. Self-interest is now the exclusive pursuit and measure of "success": consequences have no bearing on decisions unless they detract from one's private gains. Since a truthful accounting of consequences is detrimental to self-interest, artifice is now the norm. Authenticity has been replaced by curation--everything is gamed, massaged, managed to present a fake image or spectacle.

Here is a chart of healthcare insurance costs. This doesn't reflect the erosion of value generated by the expansion of co-pays, deductions and exclusions.



Here is the CDC map of obesity from 1985:



Here is the CDC map of obesity for 2023:



Private wealth has skyrocketed...



... but not everyone gained ground. As I have often noted, the bottom 50%'s share of household wealth has declined. Only the top tier benefited from The Everything Bubble.



Measured by wages, housing affordability is now worse than at the peak of the 2005-07 Housing Bubble #1.



As for moral decay, since honest appraisals are anathema, there will be no admission that the status quo is far more corrupt than it was in 1985. We all know it, but it cannot be admitted publicly, or ours is now a culture of excuses, prevarications, rationalizations, empty slogans, distractions and grandiose claims. The inability to admit that the status quo is corrupt is a measure of the depth of systemic moral decay.

What we've lost are the foundations of a healthy standard of living / quality of life.


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Dennis P. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, David E. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, D.G. ($7/month), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Francis ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Friday, November 14, 2025

Inequality Then and Now: Now It's Too Late

In refusing to recognize that inequality had the potential to bring down the entire system, our delay has made that reckoning inevitable.

The theme here is problems are not resolved, they're papered over with profitable faux fixes. In my previous post, I described how the problem of our collective health crisis isn't being resolved, it's being milked for profit by faux "solutions" that don't actually resolve the problem, they keep it on simmer because this is the most profitable arrangement for those providing the illusory "solution."

I have endeavored to explain why extreme inequality will undo not just democracy, it will undo the entire social order and the economy as well. We currently live in a fantasy world in which finance and market forces operate with impunity, as the focus is on profits and "growth."

That finance and market forces have profound social consequences is ignored. This reality has been explored since the 1800s, by critics ranging from Emerson to Marx ("All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned") to modern critics such as Christopher Lasch, author of The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy (1995) and more recently, by Jeffrey L. Degner in his new book Inflation and the Family: Monetary Policy's Impact on Household Life, which is described in The Social Costs Of Inflation (Quoth the Raven, via Rich W.)

That inequality of wealth, income and opportunity has reached dangerous extremes in America has been starkly visible since the save-the-fraudsters response to the 2008-09 Financial Fraud Meltdown (a.k.a. the Global Financial Crisis). In the aftermath, a number of incisive essays were published by journals left, right and center on the urgent need to address soaring inequality.

These three essays from 2011-2013 cover the many systemic dynamics of this problem: I cannot stress strongly enough that neither the left nor the right have mounted a meaningful response, as this is not an issue that boils down to a strictly partisan / political or economic problem--it encompasses the entirety of the status quo system: culture, society, economy and the political/policy sphere.

This not-left-or-right nature confuses many, who automatically seek to compartmentalize the problem and proposed solutions as left or right. Inequality cannot be constrained to stale political boundaries if we are to understand it as a problem that needs real resolutions, not superficial fake fixes. This is perhaps best exemplified by Christopher Lasch, whose nuanced work cannot be pigeonholed as right or left.

His savaging of the status quo economy's dismantling of the family can be interpreted as conservative, while Lasch's appreciation of Marx's critique can be labeled progressive. Both labels are misleading, as Lasch's work cannot be understood within the narrow confines of conventional knee-jerk us-them thinking.

This applies to all thoughtful discussions of soaring inequality. Mike Lofgren's essay in the August 2012 issue of The American Conservative magazine is a brilliant summary of just how far we've fallen: Revolt of the Rich: Our financial elites are the new secessionists:

"It was 1993, during congressional debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement. I was having lunch with a staffer for one of the rare Republican congressmen who opposed the policy of so-called free trade. To this day, I remember something my colleague said: 'The rich elites of this country have far more in common with their counterparts in London, Paris, and Tokyo than with their fellow American citizens'."

"Lasch held that the elites--by which he meant not just the super-wealthy but also their managerial coat holders and professional apologists--were undermining the country's promise as a constitutional republic with their prehensile greed, their asocial cultural values, and their absence of civic responsibility. Lasch wrote that in 1995. Now, almost two decades later, the super-rich have achieved escape velocity from the gravitational pull of the very society they rule over. They have seceded from America."


Jerry Z. Muller, Professor of History at the Catholic University of America, wrote a dispassionate, thorough essay on the many structural sources of inequality in 2013: Capitalism and Inequality: What the Right and the Left Get Wrong (April 2013)

(In 2012): "The central focus of the left today is on increasing government taxing and spending, primarily to reverse the growing stratification of society, whereas the central focus of the right is on decreasing taxing and spending, primarily to ensure economic dynamism. Each side minimizes the concerns of the other, and each seems to believe that its desired policies are sufficient to ensure prosperity and social stability. Both are wrong.

Inequality is indeed increasing almost everywhere in the postindustrial capitalist world. But despite what many on the left think, this is not the result of politics, nor is politics likely to reverse it, for the problem is more deeply rooted and intractable than generally recognized. Inequality is an inevitable product of capitalist activity, and expanding equality of opportunity only increases it--because some individuals and communities are simply better able than others to exploit the opportunities for development and advancement that capitalism affords.

Despite what many on the right think, however, this is a problem for everybody, not just those who are doing poorly or those who are ideologically committed to egalitarianism--because if left unaddressed, rising inequality and economic insecurity can erode social order and generate a populist backlash against the capitalist system at large."


George Packer unpacked the sources of decay that push inequality to extremes in his comprehensive December 2011 essay The Broken Contract: Inequality and American Decline:

"Inequality hardens society into a class system, imprisoning people in the circumstances of their birth--a rebuke to the very idea of The American Dream."

(in 2012:) "The same ailments were on full display in Washington this past summer, during the debt-ceiling debacle: ideological rigidity bordering on fanaticism, an indifference to facts, an inability to think beyond the short term, the dissolution of national interest into partisan advantage."


Muller and Packer dismantle every conventional "solution" as inadequate or worse: more education, more policy tweaks, financial gimmicks--all are fake fixes that avoid the hard part, which is addressing the underlying decay in both our society and economy that has replaced "solutions" with self-enrichment.

I elaborate the way this replacement of real solutions with self-enrichment has been systematically normalized in my new book Investing In Revolution.

I often reprint this chart from the Federal Reserve because it shows how the wealth (and thus the power) of the wealthiest has achieved escape velocity not just from inflation but from any restraints.



And I often reprint this chart to show how the bottom 50% of Americans have actually lost ground in the "wealth creation" of asset bubbles.



The fantasy-fake solutions of both the left and right distill down to financial-technocrat fixes that leave the engines of inequality untouched, as those proposing the faux fixes don't dare upset the gravy train that's enriching everyone in the top tier of the status quo.

I composed this chart to illustrate how the usual bag of fake fixes--more tech, technocratic, political policy tweaks, so-called market-solutions--all avoid uprooting the system that increases inequality by its very nature because this system benefits the few at the top at the expense of the many--and the few control the machinery and manage the gearing.



If we'd tackled inequality in 2012-13 with resolve, regardless of the pain that would cause those currently enriching themselves with impunity, we might have gotten somewhere by now. But we didn't. And now it's too late.

Doing nothing is an illusory "solution." Systemic problems like inequality are not unchanging items that await our attention; they are dynamic and self-reinforcing, and in refusing to recognize that inequality had the potential to bring down the entire system, our delay has made that reckoning inevitable.


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Dennis P. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, David E. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, D.G. ($7/month), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Francis ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Did the "Solution" Solve the Problem, Or Did It Just Make Somebody Rich?

Here's the real problem: there's no profit in a raw carrot and a walk around the block.

Here's our mythology in a nutshell: human needs are limited but human desires are unlimited, and the economy is fueled by smart people motivated by profit to fulfill our desires. Since desires and human ingenuity are both unlimited, the economy is unlimited.

This story is heartwarming but it's a fairy tale because it leaves out marketing and monopoly: marketing shapes desire to fit what's being sold, not the other way around, and monopoly eliminates choices that don't generate enormous profits for those who own the monopoly.

It isn't surprising that our economy is dominated by marketing and monopoly, because these are what generate the really big profits. The fairy tale features the canny innovator producing a better mousetrap but the real profits are made by eliminating competing mousetraps and forcing consumers to buy products and services that are highly profitable without being highly beneficial.

Which brings us to this question: does the "solution" actually solve the problem, or does it just make somebody a lot of money? Since the most important component of "wealth, abundance and prosperity" is our health, let's focus on health.

It's self-evident that being overweight/obese is a systemic risk to our overall health. It's also self-evident that this risk factor was relatively rare in the early 1960s and is now prevalent, with recent studies finding only 22% of the US adult populace normal or underweight and about 70% are obese.

Traditional calculations find about 75% of the adult populace is overweight/obese and 25% are normal weight.



Over half the adult populace is either prediabetic or diabetic.



The solution being offered is expensive, highly profitable weight-loss drugs which have many side-effects. But is this really the best solution, or is it a "solution" to the "problem" of how to generate higher profits?

Isn't the obvious line of inquiry here to ask why we were healthier 60 years ago and seek to replicate those conditions? In other words, isn't the obvious solution to go back to what worked without costly, risky interventions?

By all accounts, we were more active and ate mostly real food 60 years ago. We were more active in everyday life; nobody was getting up at 5 am to go to the gym except a handful of professional body-builders or athletes.

Today, our collective diet is dominated by highly processed foods, sugary beverages, unhealthy snacks and fast food, all of which meet two criteria: 1. they are inherently unhealthy and 2) they are highly profitable.

In summary: "solutions" are no longer about actually solving problems: "solutions" are about defining the "problem" so that a highly profitable fake solution can be marketed by a cartel or monopoly.

Here's the real problem: there's no profit in a raw carrot and a walk around the block. "Solutions" must be profitable or they're not "solutions." That these fake "solutions" generate new unsolvable problems--well, you can't stop "Progress."


My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)


Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Dennis P. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, David E. ($7/month), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, D.G. ($7/month), for your superbly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Francis ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Thursday, November 06, 2025

The Risk of AI Isn't Skynet

Just as a reminder of what's being gambled on "AI supremacy": it's not just financial capital, it's everything.

The risk that AI transitions from Servant to Master is dramatically appealing--Skynet!--but the real risks are in the mundane realms of the socio-economic order. As I explain in my new book Investing In Revolution, technological revolutions share the same dynamic: those profiting from the innovations push them pell-mell, without regard for future consequences, as the goal is to expand as quickly as possible to achieve market dominance.

This is entirely understandable, as pausing to assess potential pitfalls will effectively cede control to competitors.

Society--all of civilization that isn't reducible to financial data--bears the consequences, but over a timespan far longer than the initial expansion of the technology. In other words, the immediate rewards of the technological revolution go to the fast-moving innovators while the broader consequences--both the benefits and the downsides--impact the socio-cultural-political realms over a much longer time frame.

This creates a time-response lag, where society must absorb and assess the consequences years or even decades after the initial expansion of the technology. The organizational tool of innovators is the corporation, a financial structure with a single goal--expand revenues and profits by any means available--and a quasi-military command-control-communications (a.k.a. 3C) hierarchy.

This structure meshes perfectly with markets, which price everything in the moment: markets lack mechanisms to price future consequences; they only price production, transport, currencies, materials, marketing, inventory, etc. in the present.

In contrast, society is characterized by a multitude of interests and structures in various stages of advocacy. There is no one single goal or hierarchy, and the upsides and downsides of technological changes are typically distributed very unevenly.

Those positioned to reap the rewards gain ground, those positioned to bear the brunt of negative consequences lose ground. Each will then advocate for controls or let-it-run-wild accordingly.

The American ethos favors the let-it-run-wild and pick up the pieces later approach to technological revolutions. This serves the interests of the initial innovators and speculators, who can amass great fortunes in the initial speculative frenzy to get on board. This has played out in railroads, autos, radio, TV, the Internet, and so on.

Each revolution is characterized as creative destruction the buggy whip industry is wiped out, but a larger industry is created.

Here is where correlation is confused with causation: the fact that this cycle has played out in the recent past does not make it a Law of Nature, i.e. a predictable manifestation of causation.

Which brings us to AI. AI is different: it doesn't generate a need for more human labor as it expands, it replaces human labor. This is its implicit raison d'etre, reason to exist.

The rewards go to the initial innovators' corporations and speculators, and the consequences fall on a society ill-prepared to assess them, much less limit them.

AI is different in another way: it generates a compelling facsimile of human characteristics and interactions, facsimiles of thought and knowledge that we take as "real" because they're in "our language."

But as I explain in my book Ultra-Processed Life, these facsimiles are all processed in ways we cannot discern: everything is processed in black boxes following scripts and agendas that we can't see.

What's presented as an accurate representation is actually an ultra-processed distillation that leaves out everything that's unwieldy or unwelcome. We're told that what's the screen is real, but it's not; it's the equivalent of an orange-colored ultra-processed, sugary, salty, greasy goo being presented as a "healthy snack alternative" to a raw carrot.

What's being lost in substituting AI's ultra-processed facsimiles occurs beneath our perception. We don't notice what's been lost, and so we can no longer make a realistic assessment: that capacity has been lost.

AI is also accelerating the process of technological change, a process that's been accelerating for 60 years. Alvin Toffler's 1970 book Future Shock described the disorienting nature of technology-driven change, a theme updated by Douglas Rushkoff in his 2004 book, Present Shock.

Put these dynamics together and we reach this analogy: we're children playing with matches and gasoline in a drought-stricken forest of dry deadwood. Even as the formidable resources of big-tech corporations and the state rush to secure AI supremacy, we may have it backwards: those squandering resources to build out a state-corporate Skynet "to serve humanity" are speeding our self-destruction, while those societies that limit their exposure to AI's ultra-processed goo will emerge as the winners rather than the losers.

Just as a reminder of what's being gambled on AI supremacy: it's not just financial capital, it's everything.




My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition) through November. Introduction (free)

New podcast: Anti-Progress, Reverse Leverage and the Hot-Potato Economy (45 min)



Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free



My recent books:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases originated via links to Amazon products on this site.


THE REVOLUTION TRILOGY:
Investing In Revolution     Ultra-Processed Life     The Mythology of Progress

Systemic Problems/Solutions

Investing In Revolution (2025) Introduction (free)

The Mythology of Progress (2024) Introduction (free)

Global Crisis, National Renewal (2021) Introduction (free)

Money and Work Unchained (2017) Introduction (free)

A Radically Beneficial World (2015) Introduction (free)

What You Can Do Yourself

Ultra-Processed Life (2025) Introduction (free)

Self-Reliance in the 21st Century (2022) Introduction (free)

When You Can't Go On: Burnout, Reckoning and Renewal (2022) Introduction (free)

Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy (2014) Intro (free)

Novels

The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher Intro (free)

The Secret Life of an Asian Heroine First chapters (free)


Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free





NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Marty D. ($70), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Friend of Pacepa ($70), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.


Thank you, Keith S. ($100), for your outrageously generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

 

Thank you, Lee S. ($7/month), for your splendidly generous subscription to this site -- I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Read more...

Terms of Service

All content on this blog is provided by Trewe LLC for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at anytime and without notice.


Our Privacy Policy:


Correspondents' email is strictly confidential. This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by a third-party advertising network (Investing Channel) may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising; if you wish to opt out of Interest-Based Advertising, please go to Opt out of interest-based advertising (The Network Advertising Initiative). If you have other privacy concerns relating to advertisements, please contact advertisers directly. Websites and blog links on the site's blog roll are posted at my discretion.


PRIVACY NOTICE FOR EEA INDIVIDUALS


This section covers disclosures on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for users residing within EEA only. GDPR replaces the existing Directive 95/46/ec, and aims at harmonizing data protection laws in the EU that are fit for purpose in the digital age. The primary objective of the GDPR is to give citizens back control of their personal data. Please follow the link below to access InvestingChannel’s General Data Protection Notice. https://stg.media.investingchannel.com/gdpr-notice/


Notice of Compliance with The California Consumer Protection Act
This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by a third-party advertising network (Investing Channel) may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising. If you do not want any personal information that may be collected by third-party advertising to be sold, please follow the instructions on this page: Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information.


Regarding Cookies:


This site does not collect digital data from visitors or distribute cookies. Advertisements served by third-party advertising networks such as Investing Channel may use cookies or collect information from visitors for the purpose of Interest-Based Advertising; if you wish to opt out of Interest-Based Advertising, please go to Opt out of interest-based advertising (The Network Advertising Initiative) If you have other privacy concerns relating to advertisements, please contact advertisers directly.


Our Commission Policy:

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I also earn a commission on purchases of precious metals via BullionVault. I receive no fees or compensation for any other non-advertising links or content posted on my site.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP